4.6 Article

Albumin-binding capacity (ABiC) is reduced in patients with chronic kidney disease along with an accumulation of protein-bound uraemic toxins

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 2377-2383

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr616

关键词

albumin; albumin binding; chronic kidney disease; indoxyl sulphate; uraemic toxins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Albumin is an important transport protein for non-water-soluble protein-bound drugs and uraemic toxins. Its transport capacity is reduced in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and unbound fractions of uraemic toxins are related to complications of CKD. We investigated whether this reduction could be quantified and how it correlated with the stages of CKD. Albumin-binding capacity (ABiC) is a dye-based method that quantifies the remaining binding capacity of one major binding site (site II) of the albumin molecule. Methods. Blood samples from 104 CKD patients were incubated with a binding site-specific fluorescent marker and the amount of unbound marker was determined by means of fluorescence detection after filtration. Measurements in a pooled human plasma were used for reference. Glomerular filtration rate and serum indoxyl sulphate (IS) levels were also determined. Results. Impairment of renal function was associated with a reduction in ABiC (mean +/- SD: 118 +/- 12; 111 +/- 11; 99 +/- 8 and 79 +/- 9% for Stages 1/2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively; P < 0.001) and an increase in IS (3.9 +/- 1.1; 6.2 +/- 3.2; 16.3 +/- 14.9 and 56.1 +/- 28.6 mu mol/L for Stages 1/2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively; P < 0.001). In dialysis patients, ABiC was lower in those with urine outputs <500 mL/day than in those with preserved urine output (73.7 +/- 6.0 versus 83.8 +/- 8.5%; P < 0.001). Conclusion. Impaired albumin function in CKD patients can be quantified, is related to severity of kidney disease and is associated with an accumulation of uraemic albumin-bound retention solutes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据