4.6 Article

Soluble CD40 ligand is predictive of combined cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients on haemodialysis at a relatively short-term follow-up

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 2983-U290

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq823

关键词

atherosclerosis; cardiovascular disease; ESRD; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. We tested the hypothesis that soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), a biomarker of proatherogenic inflammation, may be predictive of cardiovascular (CV) events in a subgroup of patients from the RISCAVID study, an observational and prospective study in patients on haemodialysis (HD). Methods. Plasma sCD40L levels were assessed at the time of the enrollment in 300 HD patients (mean age: 65 +/- 15 years), recruited in five different centres. During a follow-up of 24 months, overall mortality, CV mortality and CV major nonfatal events (acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and stroke) were registered. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed adjusted differences in CV morbidity and mortality risk. Results. Stratifying patients according to plasma sCD40L levels in those with levels lower or equal to (sCD40L-) and greater than (sCD40L+) the median value of 7.6 ng/mL, no significant difference was observed at baseline between the two groups in age, gender, blood pressure values and previous CV events. At 24-month follow-up, a significant (P < 0.01) lower incidence of the combined end point of CV morbidity and mortality was observed in the sCD40L- group (29%) as compared to the sCD40L+ group (36%). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, the presence of sCD40L above the median value is associated with a significant increase in the risk of CV morbidity and mortality (hazard ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.11). Conclusions. These observational results support the prognostic value of sCD40L in end-stage renal disease, thus providing a useful tool to better stratify CV prognosis in these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据