4.6 Article

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL2) and ficolin-2 (FCN2) polymorphisms in patients on peritoneal dialysis with staphylococcal peritonitis

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 1042-1045

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq474

关键词

CAPD; ficolin-2; MBL; peritonitis; polymorphism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and ficolin-2 (FCN) are activators of the lectin pathway of complement and act as primary defences against infection. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MBL2 and FCN2 genes influence the functionality of the proteins. Both proteins are capable of binding staphylococci, which are pathogens that frequently cause peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We studied the role of polymorphisms in the MBL2 and FCN2 genes as a risk factor for developing CAPD peritonitis caused by staphylococci. Methods. We analysed SNPs in the MBL2 and FCN2 genes in 40 CAPD patients with staphylococcal peritonitis and in 65 CAPD patients without any history of peritonitis. Additionally, we analysed the prevalence of exit site infections and nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage in both groups. Results. The +6359C>T SNP leading to the Thr236Met amino acid alteration in the FCN2 gene, associated with decreased substrate binding, was significantly more prevalent in CAPD patients with a history of staphylococcal peritonitis compared with patients on CAPD without a history of peritonitis (P = 0.037). No difference was found in MBL2 genotypes between the two groups. In CAPD patients with a history of staphylococcal peritonitis, exit site infection with S. aureus was also more prevalent (P < 0.01), while S. aureus carriage was not (P = 0.073). Conclusions. In addition to known risk factors such as exit site infection, the +6359C>T SNP in the FCN2 gene might be a risk factor for staphylococcal peritonitis in CAPD patients due to decreased binding of FCN to staphylococci.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据