4.6 Article

The role of graft-versus-host disease in haematopoietic cell transplantation-associated glomerular disease

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 2025-2031

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq645

关键词

glomerulonephritis; graft-versus-host disease; haematopoietic cell transplantation; kidney disease; proteinuria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Glomerular disease among haematopoietic cell transplantation recipients has been attributed to chronic graft-versus-host disease. Clinical outcomes of this population may be influenced by the haematopoietic cell transplantation conditioning regimen, donor factors and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Methods. In this review, 95 cases of haematopoietic cell transplantation-associated glomerular disease were identified from literature review for analysis. Patient characteristics, the association of chronic graft-versus-host disease with glomerular diseases, and the impact of host and haematopoietic cell transplantation regimen on outcomes were evaluated. Results. The median onset of glomerular disease from haematopoietic cell transplantation and from cessation of immunosuppressive agents was 15.5 and 1 month, respectively. Although chronic graft-versus-host disease was common among haematopoietic cell transplant recipients with glomerulonephritis (72%), this was no different from that observed in the overall haematopoietic cell transplantation population. Membranous nephropathy and minimal change disease are the most prevalent glomerular diseases among haematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Chronic graft-versus-host disease, donor factors and haematopoietic cell transplant regimen did not significantly impact outcomes in this study population. Conclusions. Pathogenic mechanisms in addition to (or other than) chronic graft-versus-host disease are likely contribute to haematopoietic cell transplantation-associated glomerular disease. Further investigation will be required to delineate clearly the pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据