4.6 Article

The prevalence and prognostic implications of polyvascular atherosclerotic disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1882-1888

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp756

关键词

chronic kidney disease; polyvascular disease; prevalence; prognosis

资金

  1. 'lijf en leven' Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Atherosclerotic disease is often extended to multiple affected vascular beds (AVB). Polyvascular disease (PVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have both separately been associated with an adverse cardiovascular outcome. We assessed the prevalence of PVD in vascular surgery patients with preoperative CKD and studied the influence on long-term cardiovascular survival. Methods. Consecutive patients (2933) were preoperatively screened for PVD, defined as 1-, 2- or 3-AVB. Preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR in ml/min/1.73 m(2) body-surface area) was estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) prediction equation, and patients were categorized according their estimated GFR. Primary end point was (cardiovascular) mortality during a median follow-up of 6.0 years (IQR 2-9). Results. Preoperative MDRD-GFR was classified as normal kidney function (GFR >= 90) or mild (GFR 60-89), moderate (GFR 30-59) and severe (GFR < 30) kidney disease in 779 (27%), 1423 (48%), 605 (21%) and 124 (4%) patients, respectively. One-vessel disease was present in 54% of the patients with normal kidney function, while 62% of the patients with CKD (GFR < 60) had PVD. In patients with moderate or severe kidney disease, the presence of PVD was independently associated with even higher cardiovascular mortality rates (2-AVB: HR 1.65 95%CI 1.09-2.48; 3-AVB: 2.07 95%CI 1.08-3.99), compared to 1-AVB. Conclusion. Patients with CKD had a high prevalence of PVD, which was independently associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据