4.6 Article

Dominance of traditional cardiovascular risk factors over renal function in predicting arterial stiffness in subjects with chronic kidney disease

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 853-861

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp559

关键词

arterial stiffness; arteriosclerosis; cardio-renal; kidney disease; pulse wave velocity

资金

  1. Renal Research Institute, New York, NY

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV; an index of arterial stiffness) was measured in 264 subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5 from three nephrology clinics ('lower GFR group'). PWV was also measured in 149 subjects without previously recognized CKD ('higher GFR group') including n = 26 with eGFR between 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and n = 123 with eGFR between 60 and 100 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The association between PWV and eGFR was investigated using linear regression. Results. The 413 subjects had a mean age of 61.9 years, were 51% male, 28% diabetic and 79% hypertensive. In age-adjusted analyses within the 'lower GFR group', 'higher GFR group' and combined group, PWV correlated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP), diabetes mellitus, body mass index (BMI) and resting heart rate (all P < 0.0008). In addition, PWV correlated inversely with eGFR in the 'higher GFR group' (P = 0.03) and combined group (P < 0.0001). In multivariable regression analyses of the combined group (n = 413), PWV was independently predicted by eGFR (P < 0.05). However, eGFR explained at most 4% of the variability in PWV in age-adjusted analyses (compared with 13-15% explained by SBP, PP or diabetes) and < 1% of PWV variability in models adjusting for age, SBP, diabetes, heart rate and BMI (P < 0.0001). Conclusion. Although eGFR may independently predict PWV, the contribution of GFR per se does not appear to be clinically meaningful when compared with traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据