4.6 Article

Asymmetric dimethylarginine is closely associated with the development and progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 1884-1888

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn716

关键词

ADMA; diabetic nephropathy; GFR; microalbuminuria; nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Nitric oxide (NO) is thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study to explore the relationship between plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of NO synthase, and the development and progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods. This was a hospital-based observational cohort study in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria [urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) < 30 mg/g creatinine] or microalbuminuria (30 <= ACR < 300 mg/g creatinine). The primary endpoint was the development or progression of diabetic nephropathy, based on transition from any given stage to a more advanced stage of albuminuria. Results. We studied 225 diabetic patients, 81 women and 144 men, with a mean (+/- SD) age of 64 +/- 10 years. The majority (183) of patients were normoalbuminuric, with the remainder microalbuminuric (42). During the median follow-up period of 5.2 years, 27 normoalbuminuric and 10 microalbuminuric patients reached the primary endpoint. When patients were separated according to the median ADMA level (0.46 mu mol/l), patients with higher ADMA levels had a greater incidence of reaching the endpoint (P = 0.014 by the log-rank test). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, the hazard ratio for reaching the endpoint for patients with higher versus lower ADMA levels was 2.72 (95% confidence interval 1.25-5.95; P = 0.012). Conclusions. Higher plasma levels of ADMA may be a novel and potent predictor of the progression of nephropathy in adult Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据