4.6 Article

Mesangial C4d deposition: a new prognostic factor in IgA nephropathy

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 886-891

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn563

关键词

C4d; complement; IgA nephropathy; lectin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. It has been shown that patients with IgA nephropathy can be divided into two groups on the basis of the pattern of complement activation. Activation of the lectin pathway of complement is associated with more severe renal disease. Glomerular deposition of C4d is a marker of activation of the lectin pathway of complement. The aim of our study was to determine whether C4d staining at the time of the renal biopsy could identify patients with a different long-term prognosis in IgA nephropathy. Methods. This retrospective cohort study included all patients with IgA nephropathy who underwent renal biopsy at our centre from January 1992 to December 2006. We evaluated baseline age, sex, presence of macroscopic haematuria, hypertension, serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urine protein, mesangial C4d staining, glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and extracapillary proliferation. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed, with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) being defined as onset of dialysis or transplantation. Results. Nineteen patients (32.2%) were C4d positive and 40 patients (67.8%) C4d negative. Age, hypertension, absence of macroscopic haematuria, serum creatinine levels, GFR, glomerular sclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and C4d-positive staining were all univariately associated with evolution to ESRD. Renal survival at 10 years was 43.9% in C4d-positive patients versus 90.9% in C4d-negative patients (log-rank, P = 0.0005). Conclusion. Negative mesangial C4d staining in glomeruli in patients with IgA nephropathy helps to identify patients with a good long-term prognostic for whom aggressive treatments are not justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据