4.6 Article

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker ameliorates uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase in rats with experimental diabetic nephropathy

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 3806-3813

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn357

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Recent studies showed that angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) slows progression of chronic renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, regardless of changes in blood pressure. We showed that the imbalance of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) uncoupling contributed to renal dysfunction in the diabetic nephropathy. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of ARB on uncoupled eNOS in rat diabetic nephropathy. Methods. Diabetes was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats with streptozotocin (65 mg/ kg body weight). After 6 weeks, rats were divided into saline (DM; n = 11) and ARB, losartan groups (DM+Los; n = 11). After 2-week treatment, glomerular ROS production was assessed by 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA)-derived chemiluminescence. Renal NO and ROS production were imaged by confocal laser microscopy after renal perfusion with DCFH-DA and diaminorhodamine-4M acetoxymethyl ester with L-arginine. The dimeric form of eNOS was measured by low-temperature sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Serum tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Protein and mRNA expression of GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GTPCH1), key enzyme of BH4 synthesis, were examined. Results Losartan attenuated glomerular ROS production in DM. Accelerated ROS production and diminished bioavailable NO caused by NOS uncoupling were noted in DM glomeruli. Losartan reversed the decreased GTPCH1 and decreased dimeric form of eNOS and glomerular NO production by increased BH4 bioavailability. Conclusions. ARB improved the NOS uncoupling in diabetic nephropathy by increasing BH4 bioavailability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据