4.6 Article

The molecular mechanisms of the attenuation of cisplatin-induced acute renal failure by N-acetylcysteine in rats

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 2198-2205

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn090

关键词

acute renal failure; cisplatin; N-acetlycysteine; p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The clinical use of cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloro-platinum II, CDDP) is highly limited by its nephrotoxicity. Although N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a thiol-containing antioxidant, has been documented to be effective in attenuating renal injury induced by CDDP, the precise mechanisms involved in its renoprotection have not been completely clarified. Methods. We investigated the effects of NAC on oxidative stress and oxidation-associated signals, such as p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), NF-kappa B and TNF-alpha, in CDDP-induced acute renal failure (ARF) rats, in comparison to the effects of melatonin (MT), one of the physiological TNF-alpha inhibitors, and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC), a NF-kappa B inhibitor. Results. NAC blocked oxidative stress, p38 MAPK activation, caspase-3 cleavage, tissue apoptosis, renal dysfunction and morphological damage induced by CDDP. CDDP-triggered NF-kappa B translocation into the nucleus and TNF-alpha mRNA increase in the kidney were also inhibited in NAC-treated rats. MT downregulated the TNF-alpha mRNA level, and PDTC inhibited the increases in both NF-kappa B translocation and TNF-alpha mRNA. Neither MT nor PDTC were capable of interfering with oxidative stress, p38 MAPK phosphorylation, caspase-3 cleavage, tissue apoptosis and kidney injury induced by CDDP. Conclusions. These data suggest that oxidative stress and p38 MAPK-mediated apoptotic cell death pathways are involved, at least in part, in the pathogenesis of CDDP-induced ARF, and negative regulation of p38 MAPK activation through inhibition of oxidative stress appears to play a central role in the beneficial effects of NAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据