4.6 Article

Molecular modeling of membrane responses to the adsorption of rotating nanoparticles: promoted cell uptake and mechanical membrane rupture

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 456-465

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4sm01760a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21303269, 21273287, 21033005]
  2. program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China [NCET-10-0815]
  3. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar of Shandong Province [JQ201008]
  4. Natural Science foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2013BQ029]
  5. Qingdao Science and Technology Project [13-1-4-235-jch]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, a unique dynamic magnetic field was developed to induce the rotational movement of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. This technique has been applied to remotely control both cellular internalization and apoptosis. Therefore, a thorough understanding of how a lipid membrane responds to the introduction of rotating NPs is quite important to promote the applications of this technique in a variety of biomedical area. Here, we performed Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD) simulations to systematically investigate the interaction mechanism between lipid membranes and rotating NPs. Two kinds of membrane responses are observed. One is the promoted cell uptake and the other is the mechanical membrane rupture. The promoting effect of NP rotation on the cell uptake is ascribed to the enhanced membrane monolayer protrusion, which can wrap the NP from the top side. Meanwhile, the rotating NP exerts a shearing force on the membrane. Accordingly, the membrane undergoes a local distortion around the NP. If the shearing force exceeds a critical value, the local membrane distortion develops into a mechanical rupture. A number of factors, like NP size, NP shape, ligand density and rotation speed, are critical in both of the above membrane responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据