4.3 Article

Alteration in the phenotype of macrophages in the repair of renal interstitial fibrosis in mice

期刊

NEPHROLOGY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 522-535

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01439.x

关键词

interstitial fibrosis; M1 macrophage; M2 macrophage; repair; unilateral ureteral obstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Renal interstitial fibrosis is the final common pathway determining long-term prognosis of chronic kidney diseases, but its repair process is scarcely understood. Because recent reports indicate that M2 macrophages play important roles in the repair of various tissues, special attention was paid to the phenotypes of infiltrating macrophages in the present study when the histological changes occurring in mouse kidneys after the release of unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) inducing renal fibrosis were analyzed. Methods: The left ureter of male mice was obstructed for 10 days by using a vascular clamp, and that kidney was removed for analysis either on the day when the clamp was removed or after the kidney had been allowed to recover for 3, 7 or 21 days. Results: Interstitial fibrosis assessed by picrosirius red staining decreased with time after the release, and this decrease was paralleled by a decrease in the interstitial area positive for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Macrophage infiltration assessed by F4/80 staining also significantly decreased from day 3. In contrast, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed that the ratios of mRNA for the macrophage scavenger receptor (CD204) and the mannose receptor (CD206), both of which are preferentially expressed on M2 macrophages, to CD68 (a general macrophage marker) were significantly greater on day 7 than on day 0 in the UUO-released mice. Conclusion: Although the total number of infiltrating myofibroblasts and macrophages decreased after UUO release, the ratios of macrophages expressing CD204 and CD206 increased, suggesting that M2 macrophages play an important role in the repair of renal fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据