4.6 Article

Heterogeneous flow kinematics of cellulose nanofibril suspensions under shear

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 11, 期 24, 页码 4742-4755

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sm00530b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Region Rhone-Alpes (ERDF: European regional development fund)
  2. LabEx Tec 21 (Investissements d'Avenir - grant) [ANR-11-LABX-0030]
  3. Energies du Futur Institute
  4. Institut Universitaire de France
  5. European Research Council under the European Union [FP7/2007-2013]
  6. ERC [258803]
  7. PolyNat Carnot Institute [ANR-11-CARN-007-01, ANR-11-CARN-030-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rheology of NFC suspensions that exhibited different microstructures and colloidal stability, namely TEMPO and enzymatic NFC suspensions, was investigated at the macro and mesoscales using a transparent Couette rheometer combined with optical observations and ultrasonic speckle velocimetry (USV). Both NFC suspensions showed a complex rheology, which was typical of yield stress, non-linear and thixotropic fluids. Hysteresis loops and erratic evolutions of the macroscale shear stress were also observed, thereby suggesting important mesostructural changes and/or inhomogeneous flow conditions. The in situ optical observations revealed drastic mesostructural changes for the enzymatic NFC suspensions, whereas the TEMPO NFC suspensions did not exhibit mesoscale heterogeneities. However, for both suspensions, USV measurements showed that the flow was heterogeneous and exhibited complex situations with the coexistence of multiple flow bands, wall slippage and possibly multidimensional effects. Using USV measurements, we also showed that the fluidization of these suspensions could presumably be attributed to a progressive and spatially heterogeneous transition from a solid-like to a liquid-like behavior. As the shear rate was increased, the multiple coexisting shear bands progressively enlarged and nearly completely spanned over the rheometer gap, whereas the plug-like flow bands were eroded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据