4.2 Article

Assessment of Insecticidal Efficacy of Diatomaceous Earth and Powders of Common Lavender and Field Horsetail against Bean Weevil Adults

期刊

NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 642-648

出版社

ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC BRASIL
DOI: 10.1007/s13744-013-0168-7

关键词

Diatomaceous earth; insecticidal efficacy; stored pest control; sustainable pest management

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency
  2. Ministry of Agriculture
  3. Environment of the Republic of Slovenia
  4. Professional Tasks from the Field of Plant Protection
  5. Ministry of Agriculture and the Environment, Administration of The Republic of Slovenia for Food Safety, Veterinary and Plant Protection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the search for an effective and sustainable control method against the bean weevil Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), an important insect pest affecting stored common beans and other legumes, three different powders were tested against adult been weevils under laboratory conditions. The three powders were diatomaceous earth (DE) (commercial product SilicoSecA (R)), common lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) powder and field horsetail (Equisetum arvense) powder. The substances were tested at five temperatures (15, 20, 25, 30, and 35A degrees C), two relative humidity levels (RH) (55 and 75%), and four concentrations (100, 300, 500, and 900 ppm). The mortality of adults was measured after the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th days of exposure. The efficacy of the powders increased with the temperature, whereas in general, RH did not have a significant effect on the adults' survival. According to common practice of storing common beans, we recommend the use of DE against the pest in question, as this inert powder showed the highest efficacy at lower temperatures and concentrations. Concerning the wider use of common lavender and field horsetail powders, we suggest studying their combined use with other environmentally friendly methods with the aim of achieving the highest synergistic effect possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据