4.2 Article

Dipterans of Forensic Interest in Two Vegetation Profiles of Cerrado in Uberlandia, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil

期刊

NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 859-866

出版社

ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC BRASIL
DOI: 10.1590/S1519-566X2009000600022

关键词

Pig carcass; PMI; forensic entomology; blowfly; flesh fly; muscid fly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carrion breeding insects may be of great utility in crimes briefing. Studies on forensic entomology are restricted to few localities in Brazil and very few of them were done in the cerrado vegetation (a type of Savannah) until now. This work aimed to survey the main species of dipterans associated with the decomposition process of Sus scrofa and the insect succession pattern in carcasses in the Cerrado. The study was carried out in the dry and humid season of the year, in two cerrado vegetation profiles in Uberlandia, MG. Two pig carcasses were placed in each vegetation profile and time period of the year. The decomposition process was slower and insects were more abundant in the dry season. Differences in temperature, air humidity and pluvial precipitation seemed to be the main physical factors responsible for the differences in the time of decomposition of the pig carcasses between the two seasons. Fourteen species of dipterans (59,467 specimens) bred in the decomposing carcasses. Chrysomya albiceps (Wiedemann) was the species more abundantly breed in the two periods. The other species that breed in the carcasses were: C. putoria (Wiedemann), Hemilucilia segmentaria (Fabricius), Lucilia eximia (Wiedemann) (Calliphoridae), Peckia (Pattonella) intermutans (Walker), Peckia (Squamatoides) trivitatta (Curran), Sarcodexia lambens (Wiedemann) (Sarcophagidae), Musca domestica (L.), Ophyra aenescens (Wiedemann), Stomoxys calcitrans L. (Muscidae), Fannia pusio (Wiedemann), Fannia sp. (Fanniidae), Hermetia illuscens L. (Stratiomyidae) and Phoridae sp. The Cerrado of this region presents many dipterans potential forensic indicators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据