4.7 Article

Novel ray-tracing algorithms in NDE: Application of Dijkstra and A* algorithms to the inspection of an anisotropic weld

期刊

NDT & E INTERNATIONAL
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 58-66

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.08.002

关键词

Ultrasonics; Anisotropy; Austenitics; Ray-tracing algorithms

资金

  1. UK Ministry of Defence
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J016438/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/J016438/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degradation of ultrasonic array images due to propagation through an anisotropic material presents a significant inspection problem to the engineering industry. If the distribution of anisotropy is known, ray-tracing algorithms can be used to predict the path of sound through the material and hence correctly image anisotropic components. Conversely, ray-tracing can be used as part of an inversion procedure to infer the anisotropic properties from measured time-of-flight data. However, inversion methods often require thousands of ray-traces to map a single weld and as such, a rapid ray-tracing algorithm is essential for use. This paper explores the use of two path-finding algorithms as applied to a ray-tracing scenario: Dijkstra's algorithm and the A* algorithm. Although prevalent within computer science applications due to their low computation time, both algorithms have seen little use within the NonDestructive Evaluation (NDE) field. This paper aims to both describe the algorithms and to demonstrate their relative merits for application in NDE. Dijkstra's algorithm was applied to an anisotropic weld inspection and the optimal parameters explored, drawing comparison to an equivalent inspection using a beam-bending algorithm to ray-trace. A comparison of accuracy and computation time between Dijkstra's algorithm and the A* algorithm shows them to maintain similar accuracy, but the A* algorithm to exhibit significant reductions in computation time. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据