4.5 Article

Pharmacological profile of ipragliflozin (ASP1941), a novel selective SGLT2 inhibitor, in vitro and in vivo

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-011-0713-z

关键词

Diabetes; Hyperglycemia; Ipragliflozin; Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2; Urinary glucose excretion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pharmacological profile of ipragliflozin (ASP1941; (1S)-1,5-anhydro-1-C-{3-[(1-benzothiophen-2-yl)methyl]-4-fluorophenyl}-d-glucitol compound with l-proline (1:1)), a novel SGLT2 selective inhibitor, was investigated. In vitro, the potency of ipragliflozin to inhibit SGLT2 and SGLT1 and stability were assessed. In vivo, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacologic profiles of ipragliflozin were investigated in normal mice, streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic rats, and KK-A(y) type 2 diabetic mice. Ipragliflozin potently and selectively inhibited human, rat, and mouse SGLT2 at nanomolar ranges and exhibited stability against intestinal glucosidases. Ipragliflozin showed good pharmacokinetic properties following oral dosing, and dose-dependently increased urinary glucose excretion, which lasted for over 12 h in normal mice. Single administration of ipragliflozin resulted in dose-dependent and sustained antihyperglycemic effects in both diabetic models. In addition, once-daily ipragliflozin treatment over 4 weeks improved hyperglycemia with a concomitant increase in urinary glucose excretion in both diabetic models. In contrast, ipragliflozin at pharmacological doses did not affect normoglycemia, as was the case with glibenclamide, and did not influence intestinal glucose absorption and electrolyte balance. These results suggest that ipragliflozin is an orally active SGLT2 selective inhibitor that induces sustained increases in urinary glucose excretion by inhibiting renal glucose reabsorption, with subsequent antihyperglycemic effect and a low risk of hypoglycemia. Ipragliflozin has, therefore, the therapeutic potential to treat hyperglycemia in diabetes by increasing glucose excretion into urine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据