3.9 Article

Is naivete forever? Alien predator and aggressor recognition by two endemic island reptiles

期刊

NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN
卷 101, 期 11, 页码 921-927

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-014-1233-8

关键词

Naivete; Anti-predator response; Retreat site selection; Invasive species; Behavioral adaptation

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. Institut Ecologie et Environnement (INEE) (PEPS Program)
  3. Ecole Doctorale Sciences de l'Environnement [EDSE251]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The disproportionate impacts of invasive predators are often attributed to the na < vet, (i.e., inefficient or non-existing anti-predator behavior) of island native species having evolved without such predators. Na < vet, has long been regarded as a fixed characteristic, but a few recent studies indicate a capacity for behavioral adaptation in native species in contact with alien predators. Here, we tested whether two reptiles endemic to New Caledonia, a skink, Caledoniscincus austrocaledonicus, and a gecko, Bavayia septuiclavis, recognized and responded to the odor of six introduced species (two rodents, the feral cat, and three species of ants). We used an experimental design in which reptiles had a choice of retreat sites with or without the odor of predators or aggressors. Skinks avoided two or three of the predators, whereas geckos avoided at most one. These results suggest that diurnal skinks are more responsive than nocturnal geckos to the odor of introduced predators. Neither skinks nor geckos avoided the three species of ants. Thus, the odors of alien predators are shown to influence retreat site selection by two native island reptiles. Moreover, the study suggests that this loss of naivete varies among native species, probably as a consequence of the intensity of the threat and of time since introduction. These findings argue for re-thinking the behavioral flexibility of ectothermic reptiles in terms of their responses to biological invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据