4.5 Article

XLF and APLF bind Ku80 at two remote sites to ensure DNA repair by non-homologous end joining

期刊

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 971-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-018-0133-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. ARC program [SLS220120605310]
  2. ANR [ANR-12-SVSE8-012, CE12 2017 NHEJLIG4]
  3. INCA DomRep [PLBIO 2012-280]
  4. CEFIPRA grant [5203C]
  5. French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (FRISBI) [ANR-10-INBS-05]
  6. National Institutes of Health [CA187612, GM108119]
  7. American Cancer Society [RSG DMC-16-241-01-DMC]
  8. Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer (Equipe labellisee)
  9. Electricite de France (EDF, Conseil de Radioprotection)
  10. Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer
  11. ITMO Cancer Aviesan (Alliance Nationale Pour les Sciences de la Vie et de la Sante, National Alliance for Life Science and Health) within the framework of Cancer Plan
  12. BBSRC [BB/L01386X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Ku70-Ku80 (Ku) heterodimer binds rapidly and tightly to the ends of DNA double-strand breaks and recruits factors of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway through molecular interactions that remain unclear. We have determined crystal structures of the Ku-binding motifs (KBM) of the NHEJ proteins APLF (A-KBM) and XLF (X-KBM) bound to a Ku-DNA complex. The two KBM motifs bind remote sites of the Ku80 alpha/beta domain. The X-KBM occupies an internal pocket formed by an unprecedented large outward rotation of the Ku80 alpha/beta domain. We observe independent recruitment of the APLF-interacting protein XRCC4 and of XLF to laser-irradiated sites via binding of A- and X-KBMs, respectively, to Ku80. Finally, we show that mutation of the X-KBM and A-KBM binding sites in Ku80 compromises both the efficiency and accuracy of end joining and cellular radiosensitivity. A- and X-KBMs may represent two initial anchor points to build the intricate interaction network required for NHEJ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据