4.5 Article

Genome-wide CTCF distribution in vertebrates defines equivalent sites that aid the identification of disease-associated genes

期刊

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 708-U108

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2059

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [BFU2007-60042/BMC, BFU2010-14839, Petri PET2007_0158, CONSOLIDER CSD2007-00008, BFU2009-07044, PN-SAF2009-11491, BFU2008-00838, BFU2006-12185, BIO2009-12697, BIO2006-03380, CONSOLIDER CSD2007-00050]
  2. Proyecto de Excelencia (Junta de Andalucia) [CVI-3488, CVI 2658, P07-CVI-02551]
  3. FIS (ISCIII) [PI081636]
  4. Regional Government of Madrid [CAM S-SAL-0190-2006]
  5. Pro-CNIC Foundation
  6. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico [IN209403, IN214407, IN203811]
  7. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico (CONACyT) [42653-Q, 58767, 128464]
  8. US NCBI (NIH)
  9. Spanish MICINN [RETICS RD07/0067/0012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many genomic alterations associated with human diseases localize in noncoding regulatory elements located far from the promoters they regulate, making it challenging to link noncoding mutations or risk-associated variants with target genes. The range of action of a given set of enhancers is thought to be defined by insulator elements bound by the 11 zinc-finger nuclear factor CCCTC-binding protein (CTCF). Here we analyzed the genomic distribution of CTCF in various human, mouse and chicken cell types, demonstrating the existence of evolutionarily conserved CTCF-bound sites beyond mammals. These sites preferentially flank transcription factor-encoding genes, often associated with human diseases, and function as enhancer blockers in vivo, suggesting that they act as evolutionarily invariant gene boundaries. We then applied this concept to predict and functionally demonstrate that the polymorphic variants associated with multiple sclerosis located within the EVI5 gene impinge on the adjacent gene GFI1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据