4.6 Article

Quantum approach to epistemic semantics

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1381-1390

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-015-1781-7

关键词

Quantum logic; Quantum operations; Epistemic structures

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Scientific Research within the FIRB project Structures and dynamics of knowledge and cognition, Cagliari [F21J12000140001]
  2. Regione Sardegna within the project 'Modeling the uncertainty: Quantum Theory and Imaging Processing
  3. Italian Ministry of Scientific Research within the PRIN project Automata and Formal Languages: Mathematical Aspects and Applications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum information has suggested new forms of quantum logic, called quantum computational logics, where meanings of sentences are represented by pieces of quantum information (generally, density operators of some Hilbert spaces), which can be stored and transmitted by means of quantum particles. This approach can be applied to a semantic characterization of epistemic logical operations, which may occur in sentences like At time Bob knows that at time Alice knows that the spin-value is up. Each epistemic agent (say, Alice, Bob,...) has a characteristic truth perspective, corresponding to a particular orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space . From a physical point of view, a truth perspective can be associated with an apparatus that allows one to measure a given observable. An important feature that characterizes the knowledge of any agent is the amount of information that is accessible to him/her (technically, a special set of density operators, which also represents the internal memory of the agent in question). One can prove that interesting epistemic operations are special examples of quantum channels, which generally are not unitary. The act of knowing may involve some intrinsic irreversibility due to possible measurement procedures or to a loss of information about the environment.We also illustrate some relativistic-like effects that arise in the behavior of epistemic agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据