4.4 Editorial Material

DSM-5 and RDoC: progress in psychiatry research?

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 810-814

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrn3621

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH079513] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS052819] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroscience studies into psychiatric disorders generally rely on disease definitions that are based on the influential Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the fifth edition of which (DSM-5) was released earlier this year. Designed as a purely diagnostic tool, the DSM considers different disorders as distinct entities. However, boundaries between disorders are often not as strict as the DSM suggests. To provide an alternative framework for research into psychiatric disorders, the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has recently introduced its Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project. In the RDoC, five 'domains' each reflect a brain system in which functioning is impaired, to different degrees, in different psychiatric conditions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience asked six leading investigators for their thoughts on how DSM-5 and the RDoC will influence neuroscience research into psychiatric disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据