4.6 Review

Guillain-Barre syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 469-482

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.121

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
  2. Erasmus MC
  3. Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds
  4. Guillain-Barre syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (GBS-CIDP) Foundation International
  5. GBS-CIDP Foundation International
  6. Baxter Biopharmaceutics
  7. Griffols
  8. Sanquin Plasma Products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is a potentially life-threatening postinfectious disease characterized by rapidly progressive, symmetrical weakness of the extremities. About 25% of patients develop respiratory insufficiency and many show signs of autonomic dysfunction. Diagnosis can usually be made on clinical grounds, but lumbar puncture and electrophysiological studies can help to substantiate the diagnosis and to differentiate demyelinating from axonal subtypes of GBS. Molecular mimicry of pathogen-borne antigens, leading to generation of crossreactive antibodies that also target gangliosides, is part of the pathogenesis of GBS; the subtype and severity of the syndrome are partly determined by the nature of the antecedent infection and specificity of such antibodies. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange are proven effective treatments but many patients have considerable residual deficits. Discrimination of patients with treatment-related fluctuations from those with acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is important, as these conditions may require different treatments. Novel prognostic models can accurately predict outcome and the need for artificial ventilation, which could aid the selection of patients with a poor prognosis for more-individualized care. This Review summarizes the clinical features of and diagnostic criteria for GBS, and discusses its pathogenesis, treatment and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据