4.6 Review

Deferasirox nephrotoxicity-the knowns and unknowns

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 574-586

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.121

关键词

-

资金

  1. FIS [PS09/00447, PI13/00047]
  2. ISCIII-RETIC REDinREN [RD12/0021]
  3. Comunidad de Madrid [S2010/BMD-2378]
  4. CYTED IBERERC
  5. Programa Intensificacion Actividad Investigadora (ISCIII)
  6. ERA EDTA fellowship
  7. Programa Interinstitucional para el Fortalecimiento de la Investigacion y el Posgrado del Pacifico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2005, the oral iron chelator deferasirox was approved by the FDA for clinical use as a first-line therapy for blood-transfusion-related iron overload. Nephrotoxicity is the most serious and frequent adverse effect of deferasirox treatment. This nephrotoxicity can present as an acute or chronic decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Features of proximal tubular dysfunction might also be present. In clinical trials and observational studies, GFR is decreased in 30-100% of patients treated with deferasirox, depending on dose, method of assessment and population studied. Nephrotoxicity is usually nonprogressive and/or reversible and rapid iron depletion is one of several risk factors. Scarce data are available on the molecular mechanisms of nephrotoxicity and the reasons for the specific proximal tubular sensitivity to the drug. Although deferasirox promotes apoptosis of cultured proximal tubular cells, the trigger has not been well characterized. Observational studies are required to track current trends in deferasirox prescription, assess the epidemiology of deferasirox nephrotoxicity in routine clinical practice, explore the effect on outcomes of various monitoring and dose-adjustment protocols and elucidate the long-term consequences of the different features of nephrotoxicity. Deferasirox nephrotoxicity can be more common in the elderly; thus, specific efforts should be dedicated to investigate the effect of deferasirox use in this group of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据