4.2 Article

Resting state glutamate predicts elevated pre-stimulus alpha during self-relatedness: A combined EEG-MRS study on rest-self overlap

期刊

SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 249-263

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1072582

关键词

Glutamine; Perigenual anterior cingulate cortex; MRS; EEG; Self-referential processing

资金

  1. CIHR
  2. EJLB-CIHR
  3. ISAN/HDRF
  4. JSPS [24390284, 25870467, 26285168]
  5. Taiwan's National Science Council [100-2410-H-004-139-MY3, 102-2420-H-038-002-MY2]
  6. National Chengchi University's Research Center for Mind, Brain, and Learning
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25870467, 26285168, 24390284] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have demonstrated neural overlap between resting state activity and self-referential processing. This rest-self overlap occurs especially in anterior cortical midline structures like the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex (PACC). However, the exact neurotemporal and biochemical mechanisms remain to be identified. Therefore, we conducted a combined electroencephalography (EEG)-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) study. EEG focused on pre-stimulus (e.g., prior to stimulus presentation or perception) power changes to assess the degree to which those changes can predict subjects' perception (and judgment) of subsequent stimuli as high or low self-related. MRS measured resting state concentration of glutamate, focusing on PACC. High pre-stimulus (e.g., prior to stimulus presentation or perception) alpha power significantly correlated with both perception of stimuli judged to be highly self-related and with resting state glutamate concentrations in the PACC. In sum, our results show (i) pre-stimulus (e.g., prior to stimulus presentation or perception) alpha power and resting state glutamate concentration to mediate rest-self overlap that (ii) dispose or incline subjects to assign high degrees of self-relatedness to perceptual stimuli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据