4.6 Review

An update on primary hyperoxaluria

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 467-475

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.113

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The autosomal recessive inherited primary hyperoxalurias types I, II and III are caused by defects in glyoxylate metabolism that lead to the endogenous overproduction of oxalate. Type III primary hyperoxaluria was first described in 2010 and further types are likely to exist. In all forms, urinary excretion of oxalate is strongly elevated (>1 mmol/1.73 m(2) body surface area per day; normal <0.5 mmol/1.73 m(2) body surface area per day), which results in recurrent urolithiasis and/or progressive nephrocalcinosis. All entities can induce kidney damage, which is followed by reduced oxalate elimination and consequent systemic deposition of calcium oxalate crystals. Systemic oxalosis should be prevented, but diagnosis is all too often missed or delayed until end-stage renal disease (ESRD) occurs; this outcome occurs in >30% of patients with primary hyperoxaluria type I. The fact that such a large proportion of patients have such poor outcomes is particularly unfortunate as ESRD can be delayed or even prevented by early intervention. Treatment options for primary hyperoxaluria include alkaline citrate, orthophosphate, or magnesium. In addition, pyridoxine treatment can be used to normalize or reduce oxalate excretion in about 30% of patients with primary hyperoxaluria type I. Time on dialysis should be short to avoid overt systemic oxalosis. Transplantation methods depend on the type of primary hyperoxaluria and on the particular patient, but combined liver and kidney transplantation is the method of choice in patients with primary hyperoxaluria type I and isolated kidney transplantation is the preferred method in those with primary hyperoxaluria type II. To the best of our knowledge, progression to ESRD has not yet been reported in any patient with primary hyperoxaluria type III.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据