4.7 Review

Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 507-515

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrg3457

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA055075, P01 CA087969] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR025005] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHGRI NIH HHS [U01 HG004424, U01 HG004402, U01 HG004399, U01 HG004446, R01 HG006399] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01HC25195, N01 HC025195, HHSN268201100008I, HHSN268201100007C, R01 HL087641, HHSN268201100005I, HHSN268201100005G, HHSN268201100009C, R01 HL086694, HHSN268201100011C, HHSN268201100009I, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100011I, HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100012C, HHSN268201100010C, R01 HL059367, N02HL64278, HHSN268201100007I, HHSN268201100006C] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK058845] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM099568, R01 GM075091] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH100141] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The success of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) has led to increasing interest in making predictions of complex trait phenotypes, including disease, from genotype data. Rigorous assessment of the value of predictors is crucial before implementation. Here we discuss some of the limitations and pitfalls of prediction analysis and show how naive implementations can lead to severe bias and misinterpretation of results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据