4.6 Article

Static and fatigue tensile properties of cross-ply laminates containing vascules for self-healing applications

期刊

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/1/015003

关键词

self-healing; fibre reinforced polymer; cross-ply laminate; matrix damage

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/G036772]
  2. Fundacio Obra Social la Caixa
  3. European FP7 HIPOCRATES [ACP3-GA-2013-605412]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1102893] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of including hollow channels (vascules) within cross-ply laminates on static tensile properties and fatigue performance is investigated. No change in mechanical properties or damage formation is observed when a single vascule is included in the 0/90 interface, representing 0.5% of the cross sectional area within the specimen. During tensile loading, matrix cracks develop in the 90 degrees layers leading to a reduction of stiffness and strength (defined as the loss of linearity) and a healing agent is injected through the vascules in order to heal them and mitigate the caused degradation. Two different healing agents, a commercial low viscosity epoxy resin (RT151, Resintech) and a toughened epoxy blend (bespoke, in-house formulation) have been used to successfully recover stiffness under static loading conditions. The RT151 system recovered 75% of the initial failure strength, whereas the toughened epoxy blend achieved a recovery of 67%. Under fatigue conditions, post healing, a rapid decay of stiffness was observed as the healed damage re-opened within the first 2500 cycles. This was caused by the high fatigue loading intensity, which was near the static failure strength of the healing resin. However, the potential for ameliorating (via self-healing or autonomous repair) more diffuse transverse matrix damage via a vascular network has been shown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据