4.6 Review

Thyroid dysfunction in the elderly

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 194-204

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.30

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0601811] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0601811] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0601811] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thyroid dysfunction is common in the general population, and mild or subclinical forms can be present in more than 10% of individuals aged > 80 years. The diagnosis of abnormal thyroid hormone concentrations in people aged > 60 years poses a challenge, as the clinical presentation of thyroid dysfunction is usually nonspecific, and ageing is associated with a number of physiological changes that can affect thyroid function test results. Furthermore, the presence of acute or chronic nonthyroidal illnesses and the use of medications that interfere with thyroid function tests are common confounders in the determination of thyroid status in the elderly. Early diagnosis and treatment of overt thyroid dysfunction is crucial in this population in view of the marked effects of abnormal circulating thyroid hormone levels on a number of organ systems, including the heart, the skeleton and the neurological system. The clinical significance of mild thyroid overactivity and underactivity remains uncertain, and the need for treatment of subclinical thyroid dysfunction is much debated. A number of large epidemiological studies have identified associations between mild thyroid dysfunction and short-term as well as long-term adverse outcomes, and a small but increasing number of randomized controlled intervention studies have been reported. Guidelines recommend treatment of thyroid dysfunction on the basis of the degree of abnormal serum TSH concentrations, patient age and associated comorbidities. This Review describes the current evidence on the prevalence, diagnosis, management and long-term consequences of thyroid dysfunction in the elderly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据