4.6 Article

Use of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid adhesion peptides coupled with a new collagen scaffold to engineer a myocardium-like tissue graft

期刊

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio1451

关键词

collagen matrices; contraction; heart; integrin adhesion molecules; tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Cardiac tissue engineering might be useful in treatment of diseased myocardium or cardiac malformations. The creation of functional, biocompatible contractile tissues, however, remains challenging. We hypothesized that coupling of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine (RGD(+)) adhesion peptides would improve cardiomyocyte viability and differentiation and contractile performance of collagen-cell scaffolds. Methods Clinically approved collagen scaffolds were functionalized with RGD(+) cells and seeded with cardiomyocytes. Contractile performance, cardiomyocyte viability and differentiation were analyzed at days 1 and 8 and/or after culture for 1 month. Results The method used for the RGD(+) cell-collagen scaffold coupling enabled the following features: high coupling yields and complete washout of excess reagent and by-products with no need for chromatography; spectroscopic quantification of RGD(+) coupling; a spacer arm of 36 angstrom, a length reported as optimal for RGD(+)-peptide presentation and favorable for integrin-receptor clustering and subsequent activation. Isotonic and isometric mechanical parameters, either spontaneous or electrostimulated, exhibited good performance in RGD(+) constructs. Cell number and viability was increased in RGD(+) scaffolds, and we saw good organization of cell contractile apparatus with occurrence of cross-striation. Conclusions We report a novel method of engineering a highly effective collagen-cell scaffold based on RGD(+) peptides cross-linked to a clinically approved collagen matrix. The main advantages were cell contractile performance, cardiomyocyte viability and differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据