4.7 Article

Measurement of methylglyoxal by stable isotopic dilution analysis LC-MS/MS with corroborative prediction in physiological samples

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 1969-1979

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2014.129

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK)
  2. Medical Research Council (UK)
  3. Wellcome Trust (UK)
  4. British Heart Foundation (UK)
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D006295/2, BB/D006295/1, BB/G005699/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/D006295/2, BB/D006295/1, BB/G005699/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This protocol describes a method for the detection and quantification of methylglyoxal (MG), the major physiological substrate of the cytosolic glyoxalase system. Accumulation of MG, also called dicarbonyl stress, is implicated in tissue damage in aging and disease. Measurement of MG is important in physiological studies, in the development of glyoxalase 1 (Glo1) inducer and inhibitor therapeutics, and in the characterization of medical products, especially dialysis fluids, and of thermally processed foods and beverages. MG can be derivatized with 1,2-diaminobenzene (DB), resulting in an adduct that can be detected using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Quantification is achieved by stable isotopic dilution analysis with [C-13(3)] MG. Pre-analytic processing at ambient temperature, under acidic conditions with peroxidase inhibition, avoids artifactual overestimation of MG. Estimates obtained from physiological samples can be validated by kinetic modeling of in situ rates of protein glycation by MG for confirmation of the results. This procedure was developed for the analysis of cultured cells, plasma and animal tissue samples, and it can also be used to analyze plant material. Experimental measurement requires 4.5 h for sample batch pre-analytic processing and 30 min per sample for LC-MS/MS analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据