4.7 Article

Enzyme-linked immunospot assays for direct ex vivo measurement of vaccine-induced human humoral immune responses in blood

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 1073-1087

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2013.058

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1017157, PROVIDE]
  2. European Union Seventh Framework Program [280873 ADITEC]
  3. World Health Organization (WHO
  4. Global Polio Eradication Program)
  5. PATH Vaccine Solutions (EVI Program)
  6. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM, France)
  7. Swedish Agency for International Cooperation (SIDA)
  8. Swedish National Research Council
  9. government of the Republic of Korea
  10. government of the Republic of Sweden
  11. government of the Republic of the Netherlands
  12. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1017157] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay was originally developed to enumerate antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), and has subsequently been adapted for various applications, including the detection cytokine-secreting cells. Owing to its exceptionally high sensitivity, the ELISPOT has proven to be especially useful for detecting discrete populations of active cells (e. g., antigen-specific cells). Because of its versatility, the ELISPOT assay is used for a wide range of applications, including clonal analyses of immune responses after vaccination or after immunotherapy. Here we describe standard protocols for the detection of human ASCs specific to virtually any vaccine antigen after enrichment of circulating plasmablasts. In addition, a protocol is described for the measurement of mucosal ASC responses after prior immunomagnetic enrichment of mucosally derived blood lymphocytes. The protocols described allow rapid (similar to 6-8 h) detection of specific ASCs in small (1-2 ml) samples of blood and can be performed in resource-poor settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据