4.7 Article

Generating suspended cell monolayers for mechanobiological studies

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 2516-2530

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2013.151

关键词

-

资金

  1. UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  2. Royal Society
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/K013521]
  4. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  5. EPSRC
  6. UCL Overseas Research Scholarship
  7. UCL Graduate school fellowship fund
  8. BBSRC [BB/K013521/1, BB/K009001/1, BB/K013696/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. EPSRC [EP/F058586/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K009001/1, BB/K013696/1, BB/K013521/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F058586/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_CF12266] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell monolayers line most of the surfaces and cavities in the human body. During development and normal physiology, monolayers sustain, detect and generate mechanical stresses, yet little is known about their mechanical properties. We describe a cell culture and mechanical testing protocol for generating freely suspended cell monolayers and examining their mechanical and biological response to uniaxial stretch. Cells are cultured on temporary collagen scaffolds polymerized between two parallel glass capillaries. Once cells form a monolayer covering the collagen and the capillaries, the scaffold is removed with collagenase, leaving the monolayer suspended between the test rods. The suspended monolayers are subjected to stretching by prying the capillaries apart with a micromanipulator. The applied force can be measured for the characterization of monolayer mechanics. Monolayers can be imaged with standard optical microscopy to examine changes in cell morphology and subcellular organization concomitant with stretch. The entire preparation and testing protocol requires 3-4 d.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据