4.8 Article

Near-field cavity optomechanics with nanomechanical oscillators

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 909-914

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS1425

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. ERC Starting Grant [SiMP]
  3. MINOS
  4. Marie Curie Excellence Grant
  5. Nanosystems Initiative Munich
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ko 416/18]
  7. German Excellence Initiative through the Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM)
  8. LMUexcellent as well as LMUinnovativ
  9. Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cavity-enhanced radiation-pressure coupling between optical and mechanical degrees of freedom allows quantum-limited position measurements and gives rise to dynamical backaction, enabling amplification and cooling of mechanical motion. Here, we demonstrate purely dispersive coupling of high-Q nanomechanical oscillators to an ultrahigh-finesse optical microresonator via its evanescent field, extending cavity optomechanics to nanomechanical oscillators. Dynamical backaction mediated by the optical dipole force is observed, leading to laser-like coherent nanomechanical oscillations solely due to radiation pressure. Moreover, sub-fm Hz(-1/2) displacement sensitivity is achieved, with a measurement imprecision equal to the standard quantum limit (SQL), which coincides with the nanomechanical oscillator's zero-point fluctuations. The achievement of an imprecision at the SQL and radiation-pressure dynamical backaction for nanomechanical oscillators may have implications not only for detecting quantum phenomena in mechanical systems, but also for a variety of other precision experiments. Owing to the flexibility of the near-field coupling platform, it can be readily extended to a diverse set of nanomechanical oscillators. In addition, the approach provides a route to experiments where radiation-pressure quantum backaction dominates at room temperature, enabling ponderomotive squeezing or quantum non-demolition measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据