4.8 Article

Normal-state spin dynamics and temperature-dependent spin-resonance energy in optimally doped BaFe1.85Co0.15As2

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 178-181

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS1483

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic Cooper-pairing mechanisms have been proposed for heavy-fermion and cuprate superconductors; however, strong electron correlations(1) and complications arising from a pseudogap(2-4) or competing phases(5) have precluded commonly accepted theories. In the iron arsenides, the proximity of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in the phase diagram(6,7), the apparently weak electron-phonon coupling(8) and the 'resonance peak' in the superconducting spin-excitation spectrum(9-11) have also fostered the hypothesis of magnetically mediated Cooper pairing. However, as most theories of superconductivity are based on a pairing boson of sufficient spectral weight in the normal state, detailed knowledge of the spin-excitation spectrum above the superconducting transition temperature T-c is required to assess the viability of this hypothesis(12,13). Using inelastic neutron scattering we have studied the spin excitations in optimally doped BaFe1.85Co0.15As2 (T-c = 25 K) over a wide range of temperatures and energies. We present the results in absolute units and find that the normal-state spectrum carries a weight comparable to that in underdoped cuprates(14,15). In contrast to cuprates, however, the spectrum agrees well with predictions of the theory of nearly antiferromagnetic metals(16), without the aforementioned complications. We also show that the temperature evolution of the resonance energy monotonically follows the closing of the superconducting energy gap Delta, as expected from conventional Fermi-liquid approaches(17,18). Our observations point to a surprisingly simple theoretical description of the spin dynamics in the iron arsenides and provide a solid foundation for models of magnetically mediated superconductivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据