4.8 Article

Sub-angstrom-resolution diffractive imaging of single nanocrystals

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 129-133

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS1161

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DEFG02-01ER45923, DEFG02-91ER45439]
  2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  3. ACS PRF [46443-AC10]
  4. NSF [0449790]
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0449790] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffractive imaging has the potential to succeed in structure determination of single nanoparticles using probes such as pulsed X-rays(1) or medium-energy electrons(2) where an atomic-resolution imaging lens is not available and radiation damage can be remedied(3). Although diffractive imaging has been demonstrated for particles(4) and single cells(5,6) at several nanometres in resolution, ultimately, atomic resolution is required to determine their three-dimensional structure. A major difficulty in atomic-resolution diffractive imaging is the loss of weak coherent scattering signals in recorded diffraction patterns. Here, we show that this can be overcome using information from low-resolution images. By combining information from both diffraction and imaging, we succeeded in phasing experimental electron diffraction patterns of individual CdS quantum dots at sub-angstrom resolution. The low-resolution image provides the starting phase, real-space constraint, missing information in the central beam and essential marks for aligning the diffraction pattern, and diffraction provides high-resolution information. We show that for CdS nanocrystals, the improved image resolution enables determination of their atomic structures. As low-resolution images can be obtained from different sources, the technique developed here is general and provides a basis for imaging the three-dimensional atomic structure of single nanoparticles, where correct orientation of the recorded diffraction patterns is critical(7).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据