4.8 Article

Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions

期刊

NATURE PHOTONICS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 292-296

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2014.50

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chairs (CRC)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. European Research Council (ERC, Project EnSeNa)
  5. Industry Canada
  6. Ontario Centres of Excellence (OCE)
  7. QuantumWorks
  8. Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF) [J2960-N20]
  9. Ministry of Research and Innovation Canada (MRI)
  10. Vienna International Post-Doctoral (VIPS) Program of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research
  11. European Commission
  12. City of Vienna
  13. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum correlations, often observed as violations of Bell inequalities(1-5), are critical to our understanding of the quantum world, with far-reaching technological(6-9) and fundamental impact. Many tests of Bell inequalities have studied pairs of correlated particles. However, interest in multi-particle quantum correlations is driving the experimental frontier to test larger systems. All violations to date require supplementary assumptions that open results to loopholes, the closing of which is one of the most important challenges in quantum science. Seminal experiments have closed some loopholes(10-16), but no experiment has closed locality loopholes with three or more particles. Here, we close both the locality and freedom-of-choice loopholes by distributing three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entangled states(17) to independent observers. We measured a violation of Mermin's inequality(18) with parameter 2.77 +/- 0.08, violating its classical bound by nine standard deviations. These results are a milestone in multi-party quantum communication(19) and a significant advancement of the foundations of quantum mechanics(20).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据