4.7 Article

Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 22-24

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2703

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [K99 DA024762, T32 GM07266, T32 GM07108, T32 AA009455, F32 DA026273, R21 DA021793, R01 DA023206, U19MH82441]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health
  3. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Distinguished Investigator Award
  4. Achievement Rewards for College Scientists
  5. [R21 DA021273]
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007266, T32GM007108] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [U19MH082441] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [K99DA024762, R01DA023206, R01DA017204, R21DA021273, F32DA026273, R21DA021793] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dorsal striatum is important for the development of drug addiction; however, a precise understanding of the roles of striatopallidal (indirect) and striatonigral (direct) pathway neurons in regulating behaviors remains elusive. Using viral-mediated expression of an engineered G protein-coupled receptor (hM(4)D), we found that activation of hM(4)D receptors with clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) potently reduced striatal neuron excitability. When hM(4)D receptors were selectively expressed in either direct or indirect pathway neurons, CNO did not change acute locomotor responses to amphetamine, but did alter behavioral plasticity associated with repeated drug treatment. Specifically, transiently disrupting striatopallidal neuronal activity facilitated behavioral sensitization, whereas decreasing excitability of striatonigral neurons impaired its persistence. These findings suggest that acute drug effects can be parsed from the behavioral adaptations associated with repeated drug exposure and highlight the utility of this approach for deconstructing neuronal pathway contributions to behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据