4.6 Article

Sleep difficulties one year following mild traumatic brain injury in a population-based study

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 926-932

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.04.013

关键词

Epidemiology; Mild traumatic brain injury; Sleep; Recovery; Adult

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [09/063A, 11/192]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sleep quality affects all aspects of daily functioning, and it is vital for facilitating recovery from illness and injury. Sleep commonly becomes disrupted following moderate to severe brain injury, yet little is known about the prevalence of sleep disruption over time and how it impacts on recovery following mild injury. Methods: This was a longitudinal study of 346 adults who experienced a mild brain injury (aged >= 16 years) identified within a population-based incidence sample in New Zealand. The prevalence of sleep difficulties was assessed at baseline (within two weeks), one, six and 12 months, alongside other key outcomes. Results: One year post injury, 41.4% of people were identified as having clinically significant sleep difficulties, with 21.0% at a level indicative of insomnia. Poor sleep quality at baseline was significantly predictive of poorer post-concussion symptoms, mood, community integration, and cognitive ability one year post injury. The prevalence of insomnia following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) was more than three times the rate found in the general population. Of those completing a sleep assessment at six and 12 months, 44.9% of the sample showed improvements in sleep quality, 16.2% remained stable, and 38.9% worsened. Conclusions: Screening for sleep difficulties should occur routinely following a mild brain injury to identify adults potentially at risk of poor recovery. Interventions to improve sleep are needed to facilitate recovery from injury, and to prevent persistent sleep difficulties emerging. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据