4.8 Article

Stable cycling of double-walled silicon nanotube battery anodes through solid-electrolyte interphase control

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 309-314

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2012.35

关键词

-

资金

  1. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Program [6951379]
  3. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LDRD
  4. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-l1-001-12]
  5. Agency of Science, Technology and Research Singapore (AstarSTAR)
  6. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  7. National Science Foundation
  8. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the performance of lithium ion-batteries continues to improve, their energy density and cycle life remain insufficient for applications in consumer electronics, transport and large-scale renewable energy storage(1-5). Silicon has a large charge storage capacity and this makes it an attractive anode material, but pulverization during cycling and an unstable solid-electrolyte interphase has limited the cycle life of silicon anodes to hundreds of cycles(6-11). Here, we show that anodes consisting of an active silicon nanotube surrounded by an ion-permeable silicon oxide shell can cycle over 6,000 times in half cells while retaining more than 85% of their initial capacity. The outer surface of the silicon nanotube is prevented from expansion by the oxide shell, and the expanding inner surface is not exposed to the electrolyte, resulting in a stable solid-electrolyte interphase. Batteries containing these double-walled silicon nanotube anodes exhibit charge capacities approximately eight times larger than conventional carbon anodes and charging rates of up to 20C (a rate of 1C corresponds to complete charge or discharge in one hour).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据