4.8 Article

Controlling protein translocation through nanopores with bio-inspired fluid walls

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 253-260

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.12

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0449088]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1R01GM081705]
  3. Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [3P50 AG005131]
  4. Alzheimer's Association [NIRG-08-91651]
  5. National Human Genome Research Institute [HG003290, HG004776]
  6. Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need Fellowship
  7. Directorate For Engineering [0932823, 0933384, 0449088] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [846628] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0449088, 0933384, 0932823] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthetic nanopores have been used to study individual biomolecules in high throughput, but their performance as sensors does not match that of biological ion channels. Challenges include control of nanopore diameters and surface chemistry, modification of the translocation times of single-molecule analytes through nanopores, and prevention of non-specific interactions with pore walls. Here, inspired by the olfactory sensilla of insect antennae, we show that coating nanopores with a fluid lipid bilayer tailors their surface chemistry and allows fine-tuning and dynamic variation of pore diameters in subnanometre increments. Incorporation of mobile ligands in the lipid bilayer conferred specificity and slowed the translocation of targeted proteins sufficiently to time-resolve translocation events of individual proteins. Lipid coatings also prevented pores from clogging, eliminated non-specific binding and enabled the translocation of amyloid-beta (Ab) oligomers and fibrils. Through combined analysis of their translocation time, volume, charge, shape and ligand affinity, different proteins were identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据