4.8 Article

The DNA methylation landscape of glioblastoma disease progression shows extensive heterogeneity in time and space

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1611-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0156-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund grant [FWF KLI394, FWF I2714-B31]
  2. Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (European Union's Seventh Framework Programme) [PCIG12-GA-2012-333595]
  3. ERA-NET project grant [EpiMark FWF I 1575-B19]
  4. ERC Starting Grant (European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme) [640396, 679146]
  5. New Frontiers Group award of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
  6. Roche Austria
  7. Austrian Society of Neurology
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [KLI394] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is characterized by widespread genetic and transcriptional heterogeneity, yet little is known about the role of the epigenome in glioblastoma disease progression. Here, we present genome-scale maps of DNA methylation in matched primary and recurring glioblastoma tumors, using data from a highly annotated clinical cohort that was selected through a national patient registry. We demonstrate the feasibility of DNA methylation mapping in a large set of routinely collected FFPE samples, and we validate bisulfite sequencing as a multipurpose assay that allowed us to infer a range of different genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional characteristics of the profiled tumor samples. On the basis of these data, we identified subtle differences between primary and recurring tumors, links between DNA methylation and the tumor microenvironment, and an association of epigenetic tumor heterogeneity with patient survival. In summary, this study establishes an open resource for dissecting DNA methylation heterogeneity in a genetically diverse and heterogeneous cancer, and it demonstrates the feasibility of integrating epigenomics, radiology, and digital pathology for a national cohort, thereby leveraging existing samples and data collected as part of routine clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据