4.8 Article

Therapy of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease in mice by feeding a cholesterol-enriched diet

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 1130-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2833

关键词

-

资金

  1. PMD foundation
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SA2114/1-1]
  3. EU-FP7
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  5. European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant
  6. BMBF [01GQ0810]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Duplication of PLP1 (proteolipid protein gene 1) and the subsequent overexpression of the myelin protein PLP (also known as DM20) in oligodendrocytes is the most frequent cause of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD), a fatal leukodystrophy(1) without therapeutic options(2,3). PLP binds cholesterol and is contained within membrane lipid raft microdomains(4). Cholesterol availability is the rate-limiting factor of central nervous system myelin synthesis(5). Transgenic mice with extra copies of the Plp1 gene(6) are accurate models of PMD. Dysmyelination(6-8) followed by demyelination(9,10), secondary inflammation and axon damage contribute to the severe motor impairment in these mice(9,10). The finding that in Plp1-transgenic oligodendrocytes, PLP and cholesterol accumulate in late endosomes and lysosomes (endo/lysosomes)(9,11-13), prompted us to further investigate the role of cholesterol in PMD. Here we show that cholesterol itself promotes normal PLP trafficking and that dietary cholesterol influences PMD pathology. In a preclinical trial, PMD mice were fed a cholesterol-enriched diet. This restored oligodendrocyte numbers and ameliorated intracellular PLP accumulation. Moreover, myelin content increased, inflammation and gliosis were reduced and motor defects improved. Even after onset of clinical symptoms, cholesterol treatment prevented disease progression. Dietary cholesterol did not reduce Plp1 overexpression but facilitated incorporation of PLP into myelin membranes. These findings may have implications for therapeutic interventions in patients with PMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据