4.8 Article

The NLRP3 inflammasome instigates obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 179-U214

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2279

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nutrition and Obesity Research Center (US National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [P30 DK072476]
  2. NIH [R01AG31797, DK083615, 1 P20 RR02/1945]
  3. Coypu Foundation
  4. Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of chronic inflammation during obesity in the absence of overt infection or well-defined autoimmune processes is a puzzling phenomenon. The Nod-like receptor (NLR) family of innate immune cell sensors, such as the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (Nlrp3, but also known as Nalp3 or cryopyrin) inflammasome are implicated in recognizing certain nonmicrobial originated 'danger signals' leading to caspase-1 activation and subsequent interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) and IL-18 secretion. We show that calorie restriction and exercise-mediated weight loss in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes is associated with a reduction in adipose tissue expression of Nlrp3 as well as with decreased inflammation and improved insulin sensitivity. We further found that the Nlrp3 inflammasome senses lipotoxicity-associated increases in intracellular ceramide to induce caspase-1 cleavage in macrophages and adipose tissue. Ablation of Nlrp3 in mice prevents obesity-induced inflammasome activation in fat depots and liver as well as enhances insulin signaling. Furthermore, elimination of Nlrp3 in obese mice reduces IL-18 and adipose tissue interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) expression, increases naive T cell numbers and reduces effector T cell numbers in adipose tissue. Collectively, these data establish that the Nlrp3 inflammasome senses obesity-associated danger signals and contributes to obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据