4.8 Article

EGFR and EphA2 are host factors for hepatitis C virus entry and possible targets for antiviral therapy

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 589-U109

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2341

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2008-AdG-233130-HEPCENT]
  2. INTERREG-IV-Rhin Superieur-FEDER-Hepato-Regio-Net
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-05-CEXC-008]
  4. Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida [2008/354]
  5. Region Alsace
  6. Institut National du Cancer
  7. Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire
  8. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  9. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  10. Universite de Strasbourg
  11. US National Insititutes of Health [1K08DE020139-01A1]
  12. UK Medical Research Council
  13. Wellcome Trust
  14. MRC [G0400802, MC_U130184144, G0801976] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Medical Research Council [G0400802, G0801976, MC_U130184144] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver disease, but therapeutic options are limited and there are no prevention strategies. Viral entry is the first step of infection and requires the cooperative interaction of several host cell factors. Using a functional RNAi kinase screen, we identified epidermal growth factor receptor and ephrin receptor A2 as host cofactors for HCV entry. Blocking receptor kinase activity by approved inhibitors broadly impaired infection by all major HCV genotypes and viral escape variants in cell culture and in a human liver chimeric mouse model in vivo. The identified receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) mediate HCV entry by regulating CD81-claudin-1 co-receptor associations and viral glycoprotein-dependent membrane fusion. These results identify RTKs as previously unknown HCV entry cofactors and show that tyrosine kinase inhibitors have substantial antiviral activity. Inhibition of RTK function may constitute a new approach for prevention and treatment of HCV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据