4.8 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: CXCR2 mediates NADPH oxidase-independent neutrophil extracellular trap formation in cystic fibrosis airway inflammation (Retracted article. See vol. 17, pg. 899, 2011)

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 1018-U114

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2209

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. German Society of Pediatric Pneumology
  4. PINAe.V.
  5. Novartis Foundation
  6. Ernest-Solvay-Foundation
  7. [HA 5274/3-1]
  8. [2081/3-3]
  9. [MA 2081/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upon activation, neutrophils release DNA fibers decorated with antimicrobial proteins, forming neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)(1-3). Although NETs are bactericidal and contribute to innate host defense, excessive NET formation has been linked to the pathogenesis of autoinflammatory diseases(4,5). However, the mechanisms regulating NET formation, particularly during chronic inflammation, are poorly understood. Here we show that the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) CXCR2 mediates NET formation. Downstream analyses showed that CXCR2-mediated NET formation was independent of NADPH oxidase and involved Src family kinases. We show the pathophysiological relevance of this mechanism in cystic fibrosis lung disease, characterized by chronic neutrophilic inflammation(6,7). We found abundant NETs in airway fluids of individuals with cystic fibrosis and mouse cystic fibrosis lung disease, and NET amounts correlated with impaired obstructive lung function. Pulmonary blockade of CXCR2 by intra-airway delivery of small-molecule antagonists inhibited NET formation and improved lung function in vivo without affecting neutrophil recruitment, proteolytic activity or antibacterial host defense. These studies establish CXCR2 as a receptor mediating NADPH oxidase-independent NET formation and provide evidence that this GPCR pathway is operative and druggable in cystic fibrosis lung disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据