4.8 Article

NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing bacterial handling and antigen presentation

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 90-U128

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2069

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. UK Higher Education Funding Council
  3. Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  4. National Institute of Health Research Specialist Biomedical Research Centre in Microbial Disease [01CD1]
  5. Action Medical Research
  6. Digestive Disorders Foundation and National Association for Crohn's and Colitis and The Barbour Trust in Memory of Simon Ash
  7. Fondation Philippe Weiner Maurice Anspach
  8. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing-2 (NOD2) acts as a bacterial sensor in dendritic cells (DCs), but it is not clear how bacterial recognition links with antigen presentation after NOD2 stimulation. NOD2 variants are associated with Crohn's disease, where breakdown in self-recognition of commensal bacteria leads to gastrointestinal inflammation. Here we show NOD2 triggering by muramyldipeptide induces autophagy in DCs. This effect requires receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase-2 (RIPK-2), autophagy-related protein-5 (ATG5), ATG7 and ATG16L1 but not NLR family, pyrin domain containing-3 (NALP3). We show that NOD2-mediated autophagy is required for both bacterial handling and generation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses in DCs. DCs from individuals with Crohn's disease expressing Crohn's disease-associated NOD2 or ATG16L1 risk variants are defective in autophagy induction, bacterial trafficking and antigen presentation. Our findings link two Crohn's disease-associated susceptibility genes in a single functional pathway and reveal defects in this pathway in Crohn's disease DCs that could lead to bacterial persistence via impaired lysosomal destruction and immune mediated clearance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据