4.8 Article

Compositional and orientational control in metal halide perovskites of reduced dimensionality

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 900-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-018-0154-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ontario Research Fund Research Excellence Program
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  3. US Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2524]
  4. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-11-009-21]
  5. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  6. NSF GRFP [DGE-1147470]
  7. NSF
  8. NIH/NIGMS via NSF award [DMR-1332208]
  9. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  10. NSERC
  11. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  12. Government of Saskatchewan
  13. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  14. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduced-dimensional metal halide perovskites (RDPs) have attracted significant attention in recent years due to their promising light harvesting and emissive properties. We sought to increase the systematic understanding of how RDPs are formed. Here we report that layered intermediate complexes formed with the solvent provide a scaffold that facilitates the nucleation and growth of RDPs during annealing, as observed via in situ X-ray scattering. Transient absorption spectroscopy of RDP single crystals and films enables the identification of the distribution of quantum well thicknesses. These insights allow us to develop a kinetic model of RDP formation that accounts for the experimentally observed size distribution of wells. RDPs exhibit a thickness distribution (with sizes that extend above n = 5) determined largely by the stoichiometric proportion between the intercalating cation and solvent complexes. The results indicate a means to control the distribution, composition and orientation of RDPs via the selection of the intercalating cation, the solvent and the deposition technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据