4.8 Article

Hippo/YAP-mediated rigidity-dependent motor neuron differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 599-604

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3945

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1129611, CBET 1149401]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1R21HL114011, 2R01DE016530-06, R01NS062792, R01AR060837]
  3. American Heart Association [12SDG12180025]
  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1149401] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Directorate For Engineering
  8. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1129611] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1149401] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our understanding of the intrinsic mechanosensitive properties of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), in particular the effects that the physical microenvironment has on their differentiation, remains elusive(1). Here, we show that neural induction and caudalization of hPSCs can be accelerated by using a synthetic microengineered substrate system consisting of poly(dimethylsiloxane) micropost arrays (PMAs) with tunable mechanical rigidities. The purity and yield of functional motor neurons derived from hPSCs within 23 days of culture using soft PMAs were improved more than fourfold and tenfold, respectively, compared with coverslips or rigid PMAs. Mechanistic studies revealed a multi-targeted mechano-transductive process involving Smad phosphorylation and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, regulated by rigidity-dependent Hippo/YAP activities and actomyosin cytoskeleton integrity and contractility. Our findings suggest that substrate rigidity is an important biophysical cue influencing neural induction and subtype specification, and that microengineered substrates can thus serve as a promising platform for large-scale culture of hPSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据