4.8 Article

Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 850-855

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3700

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DGE 0903661, CAREER CHE-1004218, DMR-0968937, NanoEHS-1134289]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. NRF Singapore
  4. Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-0171]
  5. NSF-ACIF
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [0968937] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  9. Directorate For Engineering [1235870] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  11. Directorate For Engineering [1134289] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24656028] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient evolution of hydrogen through electrocatalysis at low overpotentials holds tremendous promise for clean energy. Hydrogen evolution can be easily achieved by electrolysis at large potentials that can be lowered with expensive platinum-based catalysts. Replacement of Pt with inexpensive, earth-abundant electrocatalysts would be significantly beneficial for clean and efficient hydrogen evolution. To this end, promising results have been reported using 2H (trigonal prismatic) XS2 (where X = Mo or W) nanoparticles with a high concentration of metallic edges. The key challenges for XS2 are increasing the number and catalytic activity of active sites. Here we report monolayered nanosheets of chemically exfoliated WS2 as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution with very low overpotentials. Analyses indicate that the enhanced electrocatalytic activity of WS2 is associated with the high concentration of the strained metallic 1T (octahedral) phase in the as-exfoliated nanosheets. Our results suggest that chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets are interesting catalysts for hydrogen evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据